You already offer this group of cross-border owners an end-to-end service: buying, renovation, leasing, property management. The core of this proposal is simple — turn that service into a single page they can open from their phone, anytime.
Core of the proposal: a dedicated Owner PWA (Progressive Web App).
The owner opens the browser, logs in, and sees all their properties — the one in Bangkok, the one in Chiang Mai, the one in Dubai — with each card showing this month's rent, rental status, and recent repair progress.
Want to contact the property manager? One tap connects them via LINE to the right person. Want the annual report? The system generates it automatically. That simple.
I recommend deliberately making the MVP "small" — only the features owners use daily and your existing service can immediately support. Once it runs smoothly with stable feedback, then expand.
Anything in "Excludes" can be added in later phases once the MVP runs smoothly. Scope and timeline negotiable.
Actual timeline depends on requirement complexity and data readiness. Each phase has clear deliverables so you stay in the loop.
Interviews with the founder and the property management team to confirm data fields, workflow, and visual direction. Deliver complete UI mockups, then begin development.
Owner login, property list, financial display, back-office UI. Deliver preview builds at each stage — you can check progress live anytime.
Select 5–10 friendly owners for a closed beta. Optimize experience. Import existing client data into the system.
System goes live. Documentation and training for sales and property management teams.
Free bug fixes for an initial period after launch. Long-term maintenance contract optional thereafter.
Engagement is milestone-based — each phase completes and deliverables are signed off before moving to the next.
Specific pricing depends on the final confirmed scope and feature complexity. After the first requirements interview, I'll provide a detailed scope document and quotation for your review.
Overall investment has three parts: one-time MVP build, monthly post-launch maintenance, and future feature extensions. The MVP goal is to get the core service running smoothly. Whether to scale up is entirely your call, based on actual results.
I'm not an agency, but I'm not a lone freelancer either.
I operate with a "single point of responsibility + senior advisor network" model — all communication goes through me directly, no project managers relaying messages; but on key decisions (system architecture, security review, pre-launch testing), I bring in senior engineers with B2B SaaS experience to review and sign off.
Single contact, no team to navigate. Need adjustments or decisions? One call handles it.
No agency markup layers, but agency-grade quality review.
Only 1–2 projects at a time. You are my core client during this period.
Using the latest AI development tools to dramatically shorten delivery time without sacrificing quality.
This proposal is designed in MVP direction (Phase 1 version). The point isn't to build a huge system at once — it's to first establish the most core, most impactful owner experience.
For example:
I'd like to use a lean, fast-iteration approach — build a version that actually works and genuinely validates value.
If Phase 1 goes well, the system can naturally extend, for example:
Rather than building a heavy enterprise system from day one, I'd rather it be a product that grows with the business.
I understand this system won't directly bring you new business — its value is "making the existing client experience better". It's a brand-maintenance investment.
So I've deliberately kept the MVP scope tight, rather than the typical agency "full enterprise project" approach. I want this to be a "let's try it" kind of engagement, not a "let's call a board meeting" kind of project.
If the MVP works well, we discuss next steps — expanding scope, going native, deeper system integrations. If Phase 1 shows limited results, the investment stayed within a controllable range.
If this direction interests you, I'd suggest a 20–30 minute video or in-person chat — so I can understand your actual service workflow, and bring more concrete interface directions to discuss together.